5th Sunday of Lent - 2026 - Year A

12 March 2026

The prophet Ezekiel is around at the time when most of the chosen people are in exile in Babylon and have been for a generation.  But the international scene is changing and a new leader, Cyrus, will displace the present ruler and he will have a policy of repatriation.  However, many of the exiles have settled into their new surroundings and have no guts for returning to what will be the broken city and dilapidated temple of Jerusalem.  Having no guts in this sense might well be what the prophet means when he says the bones must come to life again.  It is a passage, however, that can be interpreted as foreshadowing the belief that there is life after death and so suitable at this time in our Christian calendar.  But in the original it might be a message to us not to get settled in our way of life, but to enliven ourselves to live more Christian lives.

In  this excerpt from Paul’s letter to the Romans, Paul is contrasting flesh with spirit, which we might nowadays think of as the difference between selfishness and the concern of love for others.  There is in all of us I suppose, something of both flesh and spirit – but the spirit here is most challenging because it is not just living a lively life but it is the spirit of Christ – devoting oneself entirely to loving others as Jesus did and is now wanting to continue so doing through us.

The raising of Lazarus is the gospel reading.  We know that in John there is always going to be a deeper meaning under the stories that he tells.  And the main one here is about rising from death to living a risen life; and we know as Christians that this risen life is the life of Christ (see my jotting for more).  Notice some of the significant touches in the story.  The delay of two days before travelling to Martha and Mary.  The different attitudes of those two ladies.  The worry the disciples have of going into hostile territory.  There are all sorts of difficulties climaxing even in death, yet Jesus leads his disciples into these and shows they can be overcome.  These thoughts are appropriate as we draw near to Easter, to teach us something of the significance of death and resurrection in our present situations.

See Jeff’s Jottings Lent Talks Week 5

Jeff Bagnall was a lecturer for many years at Craiglockhart College teaching RE to many future Catholic Primary teachers.

by Jeff Bagnall 27 August 2026
It's not so long ago that we were reading of Elijah wanting to die because of his failure to inspire the people and because of a death-threat against him. Jeremiah was in a worse situation in Judah around the 7th century BC. In that land, regard for Yahweh and the Covenant was almost entirely abandoned, and God urged Jeremiah to preach about the inevitable political demise and eventual national disaster. He had a respite from his work for a short time during the reign of Josiah; for this king tried to reintroduce the recognition of the Law of God as found written in what we now see as the early books of the bible, especially Exodus, Leviticus and Deuteronomy. But this reform soon failed, and idolatry and fertility cults regained popularity. Despite extreme reluctance, Jeremiah began the work of his calling, which was to bring him general disfavour, occasional imprisonment or confinement and continued unpopularity. There was some upbeat aspects to his message at times, particularly the one about God wanting to set up a new covenant within the hearts of the people. He suffered a tormenting turmoil in his own life; it resulted both from his natural abhorrence of preaching against his own people and from the deep and inescapable inner compulsion to undertake the vocation given him by God – announcing the people's downfall. Doing God’s will is not always an obviously good thing! Our reading is his outcry at this personal conflict within him.
by Jeff Bagnall 19 August 2026
During the time of the prophet Isaiah, the kingdom of Judah was threatened by the Assyrian empire from the east. Isaiah had recommended trusting in God to save the people and God would be with them. But the king and leaders didn’t see it this way, they felt they would loose, and forfeit their privileged positions, if not their lives. They made some sort of a pact with the emperor of Assyria so that Jerusalem was spared, although the rest of the country was invaded. So Isaiah, as we read today , reprimand Shebna the royal steward, and announced a replacement, who will be the leader to make decisions in the future; he will have the symbols of office, the sash, the robe, the key to the ordering of the country’s affairs, and will keep them safe like the peg for a tent. This passage seems to be in the mind of Matthew when he writes of Peter receiving the leadership office in our gospel reading. But the historical events behind it challenge us severely in our relationship with our world and with God, just as the sermon on the mount in the New Testament does: if anyone wants your shirt give them your coat as well, if anyone strikes you turn the other cheek, love you enemies… (see Matthew 5:38-48).
Show More